10 micrograms to 60 mg a day, depending on the page
What was studied
No published human dose I could find, at any route
The gap
No published human dose to compare against
How long it lasts
1 hour 42 minutes in mice, by mouth. Three animals given a single 10 milligram per kilogram dose down a tube into the stomach cleared half of it in that time, and the authors call the short half life a limitation of the compound. I could find no measurement of how long it lasts in a person, by any route.
What it actually is
BAM-15 is not a peptide. It is a small lab made molecule, sold from the same shelf as peptides and sometimes under a product title calling it one, and it has no amino acids in it at all. What it does is put a hole in the mitochondrion, the compartment inside a cell that turns food into usable energy, so fuel keeps burning and leaves as heat instead of being banked. That is what 2,4-dinitrophenol did in the 1930s. DNP worked, and it killed people, because the dose that takes weight off and the dose that overheats someone to death are about the same amount of powder.
What it is supposed to do
A mitochondrion burns fuel to build up a charge across an inner wall, then lets that charge back through one turbine, and the flow through the turbine is what makes the energy the body spends. An uncoupler drills a hole in the wall, so the charge leaks back without passing the turbine. Fuel keeps burning, none of it is banked, all of it leaves as heat. That is why uncouplers take weight off and why they cause fatal fevers, the same effect at two sizes. Kenwood and colleagues named BAM-15 in 2014 out of a screen built to keep that mitochondrial effect and drop the off target one the older uncouplers also have, which is discharging the outer boundary of the cell as well. In mice the useful half of that holds: treated animals ate the same calories as the untreated ones and ended 15 percent lighter, almost all of the difference being fat, with no change in body temperature. Whether the lethality also drops is a separate question, and I could find no experiment that put it to the test.
What people take it for
Fat loss and body recomposition. That is what the circulating guides describe it for, a forum guide running in micrograms for general recomposition and for stubborn fat, and a competitor dosage page running tiers in tens of milligrams. Only the dosage page says where its figures came from, self report forums and vendor guidance rather than studies. The forum guide credits practitioner protocols and research data and shows no study or calculation at all. That is what it is sold and talked about for, not what it has been shown to do in a person, since I could find no published study that gave it to one.
The dose question
What circulates
10 micrograms to 60 mg a day, depending on the page
What was studied
No published human dose I could find, at any route
All 72 PubMed records retrieved and every title read; the doses in them are mice, flies and worms
No studied dose to compare
There is nothing to compare against. The 200 mg per kilogram mouse figure quoted as proof of a wide margin is where dosing stopped because the compound would not dissolve any further, not a toxic dose anybody reached. Scaling the 85 mg per kilogram mouse dose by body surface area lands near 480 mg a day for a 70 kg adult, which is arithmetic rather than a studied dose and does not make 480 mg safe or sensible, and it sits above every circulating number, the 50 mg capsule at about a tenth of it. None of the circulating numbers shows a derivation, and the smallest and largest are six thousand times apart.
Reported because it is what people use. Nothing here recommends any amount.
How long it lasts
1 hour 42 minutes in mice, by mouth. Three animals given a single 10 milligram per kilogram dose down a tube into the stomach cleared half of it in that time, and the authors call the short half life a limitation of the compound. I could find no measurement of how long it lasts in a person, by any route.
Route studied
Mixed into the food, and single doses by tube into the stomach, in mice. In fruit flies it was in the food and in nematode worms in the medium. I could find no published study of any route in a person.
Route used
By mouth. The unit the market has settled on is a 50 mg capsule, and the microgram guides name either under the skin or by mouth.
How to check you have the right molecule
There is no amino acid sequence to check, because there are none in it, so the check is the chemistry on the certificate. It should read formula C16H10F2N6O, molecular weight about 340.29, PubChem CID 565708, CAS 210302-17-3. The systematic name the World Anti-Doping Agency prints for the banned substance matches that PubChem record character for character, so there is no ambiguity about which molecule is meant. The other check is on numbers rather than powder. Two successor molecules from the same laboratories, SHD865 and SHS206, are different compounds with their own results, and the friendliest figure in the whole programme, no adverse effects in mice given up to 1000 milligrams per kilogram by mouth, belongs to SHS206. If that number appears in BAM-15 copy it has been moved off another molecule.
The unit. What circulates runs from 10 micrograms a day on a forum guide to 60 milligrams a day on a dosage page, a six thousandfold spread for one molecule, and the capsule on sale is 50 mg. Somebody who reads a microgram protocol and then swallows a capsule is out by somewhere between about fifty and five thousand times, depending which end of that guide they read, and no page on either end shows where its number came from. The second mistake is reading the 200 mg per kilogram mouse figure as a safety margin. It is a solubility limit wearing a safety label, quoted as though somebody had gone looking for a toxic dose and failed to find one. And the arithmetic that scales the mouse dose to roughly 480 mg a day is mine rather than anybody else's, it is a rule of thumb for where a trial would start, and it does not make 480 mg safe or sensible.
What is known about harm
I could find no human safety data of any kind: no study of what the compound does once it is in a person's blood, how fast it rises and clears, no tolerability study, no dose ceiling and no adverse event series. In no species could I find a maximum tolerated dose, a dose that kills half the animals given it, or a measured gap between the dose that works and the dose that harms. That is not a clean file, it is an empty one. The 200 mg per kilogram mouse figure does not fill it, because the sentence setting that ceiling says the experiment stopped when the compound could no longer be dissolved for delivery by mouth, and the one adverse sign, brief lethargy, could not be separated from pushing paste into a stomach. Those mice also lived at 22 degrees Celsius, below the roughly 30 at which a mouse is comfortable, so they had heat to spare. The human record for overheating on an uncoupler belongs to dinitrophenol and not to this molecule: a fever the body cannot shed, a racing heart, drenching sweat and fast breathing, with no specific antidote, 62 published deaths by 2011, and 204 poisons centre cases between 2007 and 2018 of which 11.6 percent in the United States and 16.9 percent in the United Kingdom died. In human sperm in a dish, BAM-15 cut the forward swimming that matters for fertilisation in one study and raised it in sperm being frozen and thawed in another, so those two results point opposite ways. It is also on the 2026 World Anti-Doping Agency Prohibited List, banned at all times.